![]() ![]() ![]() And there are always higher standards expected of those people pushing back. "Instead, we're always responding to what civility is supposed to be."Ĭivility Wars In These Divided Times, Is Civility Under Siege?Īnd so, pushing back against the status quo will be seen as inherently uncivil by the people who want to maintain it. "People of color don't get to orchestrate the terms of civility," she explains. Johnson says this is part of the underlying rationale for the enslavement of Africans imported into America and the genocide of Native peoples. That belief would indicate that some people are innately civil, while others need to have civility taught to - or imposed upon - them. ![]() "It's always been a situation where people assume that civility is something that's sort of God ordained," Johnson says. They allowed white citizens to, in effect, civilize people they considered less than.Īnd many assumed that this civilizing mission came from a higher authority. Such laws and ordinances were designed to contain communities of color, says Gaye Theresa Johnson, who studies the intersection of civility and race at the University of California, Los Angeles. Those laws that keep them up keep us down!"Ī "God-ordained" right to civilize others "We are neither morally or legally confined to those laws. "We did not make the laws in this country," he insisted. Rap Brown told black Americans that they could ignore laws that were never meant to include them. James Forman, a principal organizer with the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, had famously promised the people who wanted to go slow on integration that if blacks didn't have a seat at democracy's table soon, the entire table would be tossed.Ī few years later, as the Black Power movement gathered steam, activist H. George Wallace could proclaim, "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever!"Įven after passage of the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, some white people were still pushing back against demands for equality from black and brown communities. The furious white pushback at integrating lunch counters in the 1960s wasn't about the grilled cheese sandwiches that sit-in protesters weren't going to be served - it was about their presumption that they could sit at the counter at all. And yet it's an assumption that depends on everyone thinking they're a full member of the community.įor many people of color in the United States, civility isn't so much social lubricant as it is a vehicle for containing them, preventing social mobility and preserving the status quo. The value of civility is one of the few things Americans can all agree on - right? That's the common assumption. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |